Shrimp News

Shrimp Farming

US Labour Complaint Puts Indian Shrimp Exports Under Scrutiny

US Labour Complaint Puts Indian Shrimp Exports Under Scrutiny
Article4 min read

A US shrimp producers' lobby has accused Nekkanti Sea Foods of forced labour practices. The complaint raises concerns over India's shrimp exports and access to the US seafood market.

A labour-related complaint filed in the United States against Indian seafood exporter Nekkanti Sea Foods has raised concerns across India's shrimp export industry. The case, initiated by the Southern Shrimp Alliance (SSA), alleges that forced labour practices are being used to reduce production costs and give Indian shrimp an unfair competitive advantage in the US market.

Industry representatives fear that the complaint could bring greater scrutiny to Indian seafood exports, potentially affecting shipments that account for a significant share of the country's marine export business.

What Is the Complaint Against Nekkanti Sea Foods?

The Southern Shrimp Alliance, which represents shrimp fishermen and processors across eight US states, including Louisiana, has filed a complaint under Section 337 of the US trade law.

The complaint alleges that Nekkanti Sea Foods benefits from exploitative labour practices, allowing it to produce shrimp at lower costs and compete unfairly with American shrimp producers.

The case draws on a 2024 report by the Corporate Accountability Lab, a non-profit organisation that has raised concerns about labour conditions in India's shrimp processing sector.

The report identified alleged practices such as debt bondage, recruitment fees, withheld wages and restrictions on workers' freedom of movement.

These are allegations presented by the complainants and have not been established as findings against Nekkanti Sea Foods.

Indian Seafood Industry Rejects the Allegations

The complaint has drawn strong criticism from India's seafood export industry. Pawan Kumar, president of the Seafood Exporters Association of India, described the move as an attempt to damage the reputation of Indian exporters in the American market.

He argued that Indian seafood processing facilities exporting to major international markets undergo strict factory and social compliance audits.

According to the industry association, these audits examine employment records and worker-related documentation. Auditors may also contact individual employees to verify their employment details and working conditions.

A source at Nekkanti Sea Foods maintained that the company follows applicable laws and regulations. The source also pointed to labour shortages in the sector and denied that forced labour was involved.

The company did not provide further detailed comments on the case.

Why Could This Affect India's Shrimp Exports?

The complaint comes at a time when India's seafood export industry has achieved record performance.

During 2025–26, India exported approximately 1.97 million tonnes of seafood worth ₹73,890.46 crore, equivalent to $8.46 billion.

Frozen shrimp remained the country's leading seafood export product, generating ₹49,037.93 crore, or approximately $5.62 billion.

It contributed around 40.19% of total seafood export volume and 66.52% of export earnings in US dollar terms.

The US is an important destination for Indian shrimp. According to industry experts cited in the report, the complaint could put around 35% of India's total marine exports to the US under scrutiny.

This is why the case extends beyond one exporter. Any increase in regulatory scrutiny or restrictions could create uncertainty for other Indian seafood businesses supplying the American market.

Exporters Highlight Existing Compliance Audits

Indian exporters argue that their processing facilities already operate under strict compliance requirements imposed by international buyers.

Companies supplying major retailers such as Walmart, Kroger, Safeway and Costco are subject to buyer-led inspections and social compliance assessments.

Industry representatives say these checks can include verification of employee records, provident fund and Employees' State Insurance documentation, along with direct communication with workers.

The industry has also defended certain workplace safety arrangements, including separate accommodation for male and female employees and security measures at factory facilities.

However, the effectiveness of such arrangements in ensuring workers' freedom and rights remains an important part of the broader labour compliance discussion.

A Wider Challenge for India's Seafood Industry

The Nekkanti case highlights how labour standards are becoming an increasingly important part of international seafood trade.

For Indian exporters, maintaining access to major markets will require more than meeting product quality and food safety requirements. Transparent recruitment practices, timely wage payments, proper employment records and independent verification of working conditions are also essential.

The complaint has not established that Nekkanti Sea Foods or the wider Indian shrimp industry is guilty of forced labour. However, it has brought labour compliance into sharper focus at a time when India is expanding its position in the global shrimp market.

The outcome could influence how American buyers, regulators and trade organisations assess Indian seafood suppliers in the coming months.

← Explore articles